Bathhouse fate still in the balance
The fate of a former seafront hotel at Cromer is still in the balance after a watershed meeting.Months of controversy have surrounded the future of the Bath House, where owners Barry and Anji Connell have dropped plans to turn it into a luxury boutique hotel and now aim to make it their home, with occasional bed and breakfast.
The fate of a former seafront hotel at Cromer is still in the balance after a watershed meeting.
Months of controversy have surrounded the future of the Bath House, where owners Barry and Anji Connell have dropped plans to turn it into a luxury boutique hotel and now aim to make it their home, with occasional bed and breakfast.
They tried to formalise the change of use by getting a certificate of lawfulness - by proving it had been a house for four years before their application in March 2008.
But it has drawn a concerted campaign by local opponents, and was thrown out by North Norfolk District Council's east area development committee which decided the Connells had failed to prove their case due to a string of inconsistencies.
You may also want to watch:
However the couple will now be asked to table a planning application for a change of use, and heard it would not break any planning policies - though officers stressed that was no guarantee it would be granted.
Council planning, legal and enforcement manager Roger Howe said it was a 'difficult and controversial' issue, with conflicting and contradictory evidence.
Most Read
- 1 Sinkhole opens up on busy Sheringham junction
- 2 RNLI rescues woman stranded on boat in Blakeney
- 3 WATCH: Military plane flies low over Cromer Pier
- 4 Plan to house Afghans at Holt Hall quashed
- 5 Replica of Only Fools and Horses van to go under the hammer
- 6 Hundreds pay tribute to Sheringham cobbler John Hart
- 7 Volunteers pitch in to clean up pond
- 8 Van driver seriously injured in collision with tractor
- 9 WATCH: Cars float on high tide in north Norfolk
- 10 Pumpkin patch proves a Halloween hit at visitor farm
Mr Howe felt the Connells had not proved their case - and councillors agreed by four votes to three.
Councillor Richard Price said taking the issue through the planning process could help as there was a public perception the saga so far was a bid to get permission through the back door.
